And they lived happily ever after... As the final chapter closes, we almost instantly picture the image of a blissful c
confronting our limitations
Joel encourages people to look at freedom as “a dimension of action rather than as an escape from something, as a living process instead of a goal. He believes the true spiritual quest involves considering what it is that binds us rather than questioning how we can become free. Couples have a tendency to idealize that bubble of bliss they experience in opening act of their relationship. As soon as the first disagreement transpires and the spell of falling in love starts to fade, they long for the effortlessness they enjoyed in the beginning. “Wanting a relationship to always feel good means avoiding conflict and discomfort,” and this Diana says, “also creates an imbalance as times goes on.” When challenges start to reveal themselves to us, we may have the impulse to give up, throw our hands in the air and find the next best thing. There is a marked chasm between the initial spark of chemistry and learning how to truly love a person.
Diana explains that just as in Hatha Yoga, “you must confront your physical limits in order to transcend them.” Since we typically avoid broaching prickly topics when the mood is pleasant, most of our “working out” happens in the throes of an argument when we are already sweating and our heart is pounding. Joel and Diana advocate making quarrels more like a tennis match—may the best man (or woman) win. They believe that disagreeing does not have to be malevolent; instead, strive to be truth seekers. Perceiving ourselves as part of the big picture, rather than the center of it, opens the possibility for more of an objective view.
Overtime our love can either evolve or stagnate—it is really up to our perception. Alstad eloquently wrote, “Each person has his or her own movement in life; sometimes the two flow together and other times conflict arises. There is no way to be harmonic all of the time and thinking you should be limits growth and stifles individuality.” Let us grow to be more curious about our mate, studying them and becoming experts on them.
your world, your mirror
The process of getting to know our significant other awakens facets of “self” that would otherwise remain dormant. In Exploring Relationships: Interpersonal Yoga, Diana states, “one cannot get to know oneself fully in isolation, for relationships uniquely ignite and reveal many aspects of the self.” Whether we are practicing yoga or spending time with our mate, we might as well be looking at a mirror reflection of ourselves. Through our interactions with others, we learn more about our own personalities, proclivities and idiosyncrasies than we would probably ever want to.
Diana suggests viewing this feedback as a gift rather than an attack. If we can be willing to make the act of giving and receiving feedback easier on both people, the exploration of self becomes an exciting discovery rather than an uncomfortable trip. The impact our romantic relationships have on us can be quite powerful. Diana compares the alchemy of a human bond to a water molecule and states, “no one touches us as deeply as those we are bonded with.” The intermingling of two hearts, two spirits and the entanglement of two bodies forever changes who we are.
The closest we can physically be to another human being happens through the act of sexual intercourse. This exchange of energy and fluids elicit bonding hormones and leave behind lasting emotional imprints. “Considering the tremendous explosive power there is in the interrelationship between atoms,” Diana explains, “it’s not surprising that intimate, personal relationships can produce such intensities as love, anger and jealously.” Being aware of the affect we have on those with whom we are intimate is integral to the success of the partnership.
the fidelity knot
Making the active decision to commit to your partner is akin to engaging in a regular yoga practice; it is an invitation to transform. Just like the “act of practicing” yoga will awaken facets of your mind and body that might have otherwise remained dormant, so too can the act of practicing a relationship leave the same kind of imprint. Relationships like art, are living breathing things. When sculpting your optimal relationship and constructing frameworks for it, the mantra to consider is “the rule is no rule.” There are no right or wrong answers and there are no mistakes.
Joel and Diana have explored the nature of monogamy through their own path of questioning and exploration and have reached the conclusion that “casual sex is like candy. It’s easy, it tastes good, but it’s sticky and has its repercussions.” Playing with sex outside of your relationship is like playing with fire—it can be explosive and quite unpredictable. They recommend that if people are going to engage in casual sex, they need to know the risks. Because casual sex plays into the dynamics of one’s ego and the ego’s tendency to chase the fantasy, engaging in uncommitted intercourse plays into aspects of conquest and does not support communion and intimacy in the long-term.
Their take on the traditional framework of “marriage” is one that challenges amny of our conventional ideals. If we were to remove the reign the traditional model places around relationships, looking even at marriage as a fear-based contract wherein we are “projecting our current ego state into the future,” as Diana often explains, then we grant the other person the freedom to do what is right for them and good for the relationship on their own terms. Diana believes that “if you try to control someone out of fear, they will end up feeling resentful and then the resentment will cause them to do the very things you fear, which is to be reactive, close down or whatever.” Often, when we give someone the freedom to exercise an option, they end up choosing not to exercise it at all. The key here is to let go and trust.
Without the existence of a contract that forbids or denies us to have or do something, we are free to do what we feel is appropriate in any given moment and for any particular domain. “The body’s potential responsiveness is limited by stiffness, lack of strength and endurance,” says Joel. “The mind’s responsiveness is limited by the way it thinks about things.” If we can use yoga to expand the body and open up the places that limit our physical freedom, so too can we use yoga to uncover the nature of what limits our thinking and perceiving when it comes to our relationships.
Often, ego fulfillment and short-term gratification are more trouble than they are worth. Like the story of the Tortoise and the Hare, slow and steady wins. This aphorism relates to relationships as much as it does in our yoga practice. Joel and Diana steadfastly believe that long-term relationships that endure sexual excursions may not be capable of achieving the kind of depth and intimacy we inherently long for. Maintaining integrity and not taking any short cuts pays off in the end. If you force yourself into a yoga posture or have a fling in the heat of the moment, your ego will be momentarily satiated but later, you may find yourself damp with remorse.
With a viable frame, anything is possible. There is not just one way of shaping a long-term, committed, harmonic relationship. We can make a variety of accommodations in very much the same way we adjust ourselves in a yoga posture. Joel talks about “the weakness of looking outside to the repeatable and mechanical aspects of experience” as it relates to the way that two people evolve in a relationship. The way we look doing a certain posture is not replicable in any other body and the dynamics of a relationship are no different.
Diana believes that having “frameworks that are functional” plays an essential role in a properly functioning relationship because “sex occurs within frameworks, cultural conditioning, sex roles, a whole history of baggage.” A healthy sexual relationship is not going to happen on its own, we need to be thinking about it and adjusting to its evolution.
ways to improve
Ultimately, the question we all need to ask ourselves is, “what is good material to work with?” Are you with someone who is in touch with who they are? Someone who you like working out with? Before engaging in a relationship, keep yourself in check. Determine how willing you really are to be fully open as this will translate directly into questions of control—how much control do you actually have or should have? Control is one way that the human brain works in terms of being self-protective and it is natural to feel a need to exercise some control, especially if you have been hurt in the past. “But passion, real passion,” as Diana beautifully explains, “comes when we let go of control and when we are playing on the interface of control and surrender. It is part of what the game of life is all about.”
Rather than forming contracts that cage love, Joel and Diana recommend creating frameworks that protect it. The price of living is dying, the price of loving is risking the occurrence of what life brings. If you have curiosity, exploration, an aspiration to get to the bottom of things in yourself and in others, if you are truth seeking, if you have this broader framework of evolution, growth, honesty and integrity to explore together, then you have something that is very erotic and is a bonding all onto itself. If you have these things, then when you do have differences, you will have this broader context of exploration, of evolution and authenticity, of discovery and learning to work through the knots. And that is much stronger than anything a contract can provide.